Reimagined Value Proposition Canvas

Service Design Intern Project - Reserve Bank of New Zealand

Supervised by Tali Maulgue and Kate Johnson

An internal tool created by reimagining the Value Proposition Canvas to better address the Aotearoa and public sector contexts when creating value propositions

The Problem

The Value Proposition Canvas (VPC) is a useful tool for businesses to identify the value offered by a proposed product or feature to their customers. Despite this canvas’s great potential in assisting RBNZ in navigating the transaction innovation space, its American origin and design for the commercial sector restrict its adaptability to the goals of public sectors in Aotearoa. 

HMW visualise the co-creation between RBNZ and cohorts of Aotearoa to guide users in creating human-centred and non-commercial value propositions?

Research Topics

✦ Understanding the Value Proposition Canvas

With the project goal of reimagining the Value Proposition Canvas, we must first understand the precedent’s features and functions in depth. Furthermore, review the critiques of the tool and analyse alternative canvases.

✦ Value Propositions in the RBNZ context

In addition to the preliminary readings completed prior to this project, we will gather information on the bank, specifically using the Value Proposition Canvas and similar tools. Insights from experts will be valuable in clarifying the direction needed for ideation and prototyping.

✦ Incorporation of Te Ao Māori

As part of the project’s key objectives, we need to research approaches to Te Ao Māori principles and identify how they could be utilised effectively in the reimagining. As a non-Māori designer, it is also crucial to be aware of my positionality to ensure that my research and design decisions respect and honour Te Tiriti o Waitangi.

Desk Research

12x Literature reviews completed
  • A wide range of sources were considered for research, including books, academic journals, and webpages
  • Resources were picked and analysed based on their relevance and usefulness to one of the three research topics
  • Literary reviews were conducted for all resources used in this project and summarised as key insights and reflect on how the information is relevant to this project

Stakeholder Interviews

8x High-level stakeholders interviewed
  • Mixture of individual and group interviews ranging from 30 minutes to 40 minutes
  • The key stakeholders of this project were members of the Money & Cash Policy team; however, it was valuable to interview experts from the Service Design team and the Te Ao Māori team to reduce biased design decisions and also make the reimagined tool adaptable across different departments
  • Questions asked were based on the three key topics and framed according to the stakeholder’s field of expertise

Design Principles

✦ Design the canvas to be easy to use and understand for internal use at RBNZ 

New headings and prompts for each section provide embedded onboarding to new users, which the original canvas lacked with its minimalistic design. However, facilitation is still recommended for first-time users.

✦ Ensure the canvas is suitable for addressing RBNZ challenges

Reworking the right side of the canvas accounts for the nuances of policy and challenges in the non-commercial context addressed by RBNZ instead of identifying Market-Product Fit in the original.

✦ Incorporate Te Ao Māori values of co-creation and reciprocity to be inclusive of all New Zealanders 

The layout of the redesigned canvas takes inspiration from the He Awa Whiria research framework, which encourages the bank to create value propositions with a human-centred lens by drawing from two streams of knowledge and aligns with the policy objectives of financial and social inclusion. Furthermore, the values of Matangirua ki Matangireia play an active role in the Value Proposition Cards.

Ideation Session: Divergent Exploration

With a defined list of design objectives informed by my research, two senior service designers and I explored how divergent this reimagining could be. All while maintaining the core function and usefulness in creating value propositions.

Usability Testing: Concepts Review

Three of the eight canvas concepts were chosen to be refined for review and feedback from six stakeholders. This session was done through an online meeting where they could comment on their interpretation, questions, and feedback on the concepts.

From the 52 comments of feedback and questions given during the review, the key themes were: further clarity on how exactly the canvas is used in-person, differentiating the purpose of similar sections like goals and gains, reworking the sections for easier application of non-commercial contexts, and the further engagement of Te Ao Māori values in the canvas.

Ideation Session: Combining Concepts

Turning the feedback into a new set of design objectives, I went through five more rounds of ideation, but this time with input from other interns at the earlier stage.

This second round involved combining each concept's strengths to generate new ideas. A highlight of this project, this collaboration helped bring new perspectives into the reimagining and made the canvas easier to understand for all people. After receiving feedback on the final paper concept, I made the required edits and created the digital canvas for testing in a usability workshop. The key objectives of this round of ideation were:

  • Simplify the structure of the overall canvas and the sections to achieve depth over breadth with a clear focus on creating value propositions
  • Explore custom terms for the canvas section to communicate a specific intent and function
  • Differentiate the purpose of all sections by reflecting on our understanding as a starting point
  • Draw inspiration from the strengths of each three concepts reviewed and explore how they can be combined into a single new canvas
  • Follow-up on feedback to better understand the participant’s perspective on the structure that would make the canvas more suitable for policy and non-commercial contexts
  • Explore how the He Awa Whiria framework could be incorporated into the simpler format of Concept A
  • Incorporate RBNZ’s values of Matangirua ki Matangireia in conjunction with creating value propositions

Usability Testing: Group Workshop

Unlike reviewing static presentations of the design concepts in the first round, this usability workshop involved using and completing the entire canvas from start to finish. Six participants from CBDC development or Service Design were split and mixed into two groups, and each group had a go at creating value propositions for the NZ transaction context.

Ideation Session: Canvas Refinement

The workshop was super insightful since we got to see the reimagined value proposition canvas in practice. We made further refinements from my observations and the direct feedback from stakeholders.

From the feedback provided on the canvases and during the reflection portion of the workshop, the key objectives of this ideation are:

  • Further fine-tune the headings of sections and provide explanations for each of them
  • Define what Challenge-Solution Fit means and provide instructions for completing the VP cards after both sides of the canvas are completed
  • Remove ‘Focus Area’, but bring its function into the RBNZ side of the canvas
  • Specify VP Card’s ‘Value for RBNZ’ so input is not repeatedly “increased uptake”
  • Explore how the RBNZ side can be designed - narrowing down the input for the tool and also encouraging users to think about potential new ideas they want to propose
  • How could we encourage users to put down sticky notes (ideas) without the need to rationalise - since rationalising is the next step when completing the VP cards
  • Consider intermediaries - should it be a new section, a separate card to VP cards or an additional side on the base canvas?

Usability Testing: Concepts Review

The final usability test done for this project was to see how the canvas would be used as an individual activity. During the group workshop, people liked to check their ideas with each other first before putting down a sticky note, while individuals would brainstorm and put everything down as they completed the canvas.

Alongside the specific pieces of feedback for additional refinement, a new crucial component is the need for a facilitator. While the canvas is designed with an integrated onboarding experience, stakeholders found it most helpful to have a facilitator to ensure they complete it correctly. After the first canvas, however, stakeholders feel confident in completing future ones independently.

Across the two individual usability tests, the key insights for refining the canvas were:

  • Direct instructions for VP Cards
    Both participants were not unsure about the next step after completing the two sides of the canvas. While the description under Challenge-Solution Fit in the centre provides those instructions, it could be useful to have more visual indicators that guide the users to completing the Value Proposition Cards last.
  • Alternate terms for adaptability
    Terms like intermediaries and tools do not accurately define the information for all non-commercial contexts. These terms represent CBDC contexts well but less so for other contexts like the RBNZ Māori Engagement Framework. Therefore, we should consider broader terms and specify the intention through instructions.
  • Facilitation is crucial for onboarding
    While participants could infer most of the sections correctly, there were multiple instances where they asked for clarifications or guidance. Participants also provided direct feedback that this reimagined canvas is confusing to use initially, but after proper onboarding the process is very straightforward. While additional instructions on the canvas could mitigate this confusion, a guide to facilitating this canvas activity should be part of the final deliverables.

Design Outcome

This Reimagined Value Proposition Canvas is designed to be suitable for working with policy and non-commercial challenges at RBNZ. The main inspiration for the layout of this canvas is the He Awa Whiria framework, where a solution is created through the rivers intertwining from two pools of knowledge. Each section’s function, layout, and canvas graphics visualise the co-creation and value of reciprocity in creating value propositions for the people of Aotearoa.

The braiding of rivers in the middle of the canvas is where you will place the Value Proposition Cards with the identified Challenge-Solution Fit and mutual exchange. With the completion of this tool, the value propositions are created with a human-centred approach and lead to actionable insights that align with RBNZ’s policy objectives.

Key features of this canvas are:

  • Supporting RBNZ objectives by providing a way for the bank to understand the unique challenges and goals of any cohort in NZ when creating value propositions
  • The reimagined canvas is understandable and useful for the policy and non-commercial contexts by adding new sections that are more relevant to the work of a public sector organisation, such as RBNZ
  • This redesign directly incorporates Te Ao Māori values of co-creation and reciprocity by integrating the He Awa Whiria framework, which supports the bank's Te Ao Māori approach
  • From the outcomes of usability tests, this reimagined canvas is usable for multiple directorates in the bank to explore opportunities that involve people